Cairo, NY --
How big a sell-out was the MINO (Merger In Name Only)? What
accomplishment can be credited to mergification other than enabling a few of the
former stars of the Champ Car World Series to occupy the driver's seats of
buzzing insect-like Dallaras at Indy?
Was it necessary for Kevin Kalkhoven to waste
his resources and go back on his partnership's alleged principles only to
bolster shrinking f-inheritor fields and to allow their once-hated competitor to
crow about re-unifying the sport that he had unilaterally torn asunder so many
years earlier?
The handwriting was on the wall, albeit
somewhat illegible at the time, when this rant was originally penned for
Deep Throttle in June 2006.
Perhaps a re-read will have you agreeing with my position then and now; that a
joint annual Indy 500 venture and/or Champ Cars racing on the ForMoola One
course was -- perhaps -- the only sensible
re-unification strategy.
"We've agreed conceptually (to
share ownership)...now we have to agree on how we would go about resolving
differences that might come up.”
That’s the latest gobbledygook being served up by the inheritor of the
Indianapolis Motor Speedway on behalf of his Champ Car counterpart, Kevin
Kalkhoven, as most of the American open-wheel racing community and its
journalism contingent desperately seeks any straw of reunification optimism at
which to grasp.
Also reported in a recent Indianapolis Star story by Curt Cavin and Steve
Ballard...”One of the key issues at stake in their talks is how they would get
past disagreements. They've discussed appointing someone who could break ties
when necessary. Individuals who could fit that bill include former Indianapolis
500 winners Mario Andretti and Rick Mears...”
Have you ever heard of businessmen solidifying a partnership based on their
future ability to resolve disagreements?
Have you ever heard of a business partnership in which a third party arbiter was
appointed before the new company ever wrote a check, cashed one, or added
employee #1 to its payroll?
And wasn’t it “disagreements” among the democratically voting shareholders of
CART -- including the Speedway inheritor -- that caused this whole split mess in the
first place and, in light of that, do you really think that anyone who was ever
involved in either or both series could cast an objective, impartial swing vote,
let alone one that the splitter would be honorable enough to abide by?
Another “new wrinkle” according to the Indianapolis Star story is the
splitter saying that "...he and Kalkhoven have discussed plans to bring the Champ
Car teams to the Indianapolis 500 next year, although details have not been
finalized..."
Hasn’t that hypocritical game been played since 1997 despite de-unification?
A 6/25/06 SPEED piece corroborates Cavin’s and Ballard’s reportage, pointing to
the more tangible chassis/engine issues involved in a merger and reminding us
that Kevin Kalkhoven is adamant that Champ Car’s planned Panoz chassis,
scheduled to be unveiled at the CCWS’ San Jose Grand Prix next month, be used in
a unified series and citing this KK quote from the original Star story:
"You
don't throw away that kind of development...it will be extremely economic to
operate."
The aforementioned aside, why has the splitter suddenly begun issuing merger
updates to the press after making like Marlene Dietrich for the last five
months? Recent comments by another series owner -- a tenant of the Indianapolis
Motor Speedway -- might have lit a fire under him.
F1 boss Bernie Ecclestone recently dropped this bombshell: "It does not matter
to Formula 1 if there is no Grand Prix in the U.S. What do we get from America?
Aggravation -- that's about all. If you say 'good morning' over there when it's
five past twelve, you end up with a lawsuit," For good measure and to make it perfectly clear that the USGP at Indy would soon
be scratched from the ForMoola One schedule, Bernie the Boss threw in these
one-liners:
"We have never got any sponsors out there...The television has never
taken off…We have more viewers in Malta than over there...Why do we need to worry
so much about America? It has never really taken to open-wheel racing...They talk
about the big audiences for NASCAR, but we get as many viewers in Italy alone as
they do for NASCAR in the States."
What series could come close to filling the void at the $20 million IMS road
course after F1’s contract expires? What other series would want to?
Perhaps a “partner” series would, especially if its currently active past and
present stars could all be on hand to fill the field in reciprocation of those
same drivers helping to revive the Indy 500.
Since Bernie Ecclestone’s pronouncements about America’s open-wheel illiteracy
are essentially true, it would certainly be as good as a merger -- conceptually
speaking -- if the Champ Car World Series and f-inheritor were both able to say,
"We’re the American open-wheel racing series that races at Indy!"